top of page

The results of the elections in Russia are very telling

In Russia, the Unified Voting Day has concluded. In different regions of the country, governors and deputies of various levels were elected for regional parliaments and other local bodies. The "official" results were not surprising.

The results of the elections in Russia are very telling.
The results of the elections in Russia are very telling.

The three-day "election day" passed without surprises or unexpected twists; "United Russia" dominated everywhere. As expected, the ruling party will retain the majority in regional parliaments. The only possible surprise was in Yekaterinburg, where "Yabloko" provisionally entered the city's duma. Russian authorities also did everything possible to ensure that candidates from the ruling party or those supported by the authorities also won in regions where governor elections were held this year. The elections seemed more like a simulation game where Kremlin loyalists were reshuffled. "United Russia" won 19 out of 21 governor elections. In many regions with an abnormal affection for incumbent leaders, the results were also extraordinary; many governors garnered more than 85% of the votes.


The Central Election Commission of the Russian Federation claimed that the most extensive regional elections in the last five years took place without serious violations. However, as usual, there were numerous incidents of ballot stuffing, scandals, and voter bribery. For example, in Yekaterinburg, a university published instructions on voting for "United Russia." The document appeared on September 8 in the official group of the Ural Technical Institute of Communications and Informatics. The instructions told students that the correct vote was to vote for the ruling party. In most regions, politicians who could potentially complicate the elections, and in some cases even win them, did not participate.


Regarding turnout across Russia, high turnout rates were reported in some places, but it is safe to say that the official turnout does not correspond to the actual number of voters.

However, the absence of competition and intrigue did not prevent unprecedented pressure on candidates and observers during these elections. The elections were characterized not only by ballot fraud and violations but also by attacks on observers and deputies (of course, not from "United Russia").


During regional and municipal elections in Russia, deputies were also elected in the occupied territories of Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhia, and Kherson regions. The Central Election Commission of the Russian Federation claims that the ruling party is also leading in elections in all "new regions." According to data provided by election commissions organized by Russia, the results for the ruling party in the Kherson region were 72.93%, in the Zaporizhia region 83.96%, in the "LNR" 75.08%, and in the "DNR" 78.61%. It is noteworthy that the Central Election Commission of the Russian Federation even conducted "elections" in areas that have not been under Russian control for a long time, and the boundaries of the "election maps" published on the Central Election Commission of the Russian Federation's website do not match the "map of Russia with new borders" approved by the Russian cartographic service. And it is worth questioning whether attention should be paid to data obtained during "elections with automatic weapons."


The results of the regional elections in Russia are very eloquent. It appears that the Unified Voting Day was a dress rehearsal for the presidential elections. Given the existing realities in Russia, the presidential campaign must also be marked by "high" turnout and no less "high level of support for the authorities." The elections of 2024 will need to demonstrate the maximum possible consolidation of power and the people and unanimous support for the "main candidate." What doubts can there be about their outcome?


Source: oglavnom.top

Comments


bottom of page